Firstly, a little bit of background history to my situation.
About 10 or so years ago I would be around 50-ish. My PSA level was high have risen to 17.5.
Went through the usual Urology biopsy (different to how it's done now) and was told, by the consultant, everything was okay. However, they would from time to time asked for PSA blood test.
Over the next 10 years, from time to time, I would have blood test for PSA. These will be sporadic as I wasn't too bothered. It seemed to only make things worse by being told it's above a certain level. Then a problem with my partner becoming ill with cancer. I put myself into looking after my partner first. Time passed and in July last year and also January this year I had a PSA blood test and showed to be high and the one in January was at 12 point something or other. This was followed up by an MRI. The MRI came back showing a problem on the prostate.
Wasn't too concerned however the doctors were concerned. So three weeks ago I had a biopsy done which wasn't very nice like a mediaeval practice!
However, the Consultant I spoke to today said it is a low risk prostate cancer, which should not present problems for the immediate future. Would need "active surveillance" with blood test and MRI scans. I am told am still young (62). Also, that a template biopsy would be needed to map the whole of the prostate to check for areas that might be harbouring cancer cells! This does concern me as doing this kind of intervention might make things worse with the cancer being spread? Who knows?
That's my story, so far....
Edited by member 01 Mar 2021 at 11:23
| Reason: Not specified