I'm interested in conversations about and I want to talk about
Know exactly what you want?
Show search

Notification

Error


Pirads level 5

User
Posted 30 Dec 2019 at 23:11

True Chris but their management of my treatment so far has been appalling. I’ve no confidence that will improve. I know it sound irrational I accept that but to give me no explanation or appointment to explain my MIR result and have an appointment clerk give me advice to come off blood thinning medication with no counter measure if my heart goes into a sharp heart rise I’m talking up to 170 beats per minute with the high risk of stroke for 4 days with no advice to counter act this is just unacceptable. 

User
Posted 30 Dec 2019 at 23:18

Have you spoken to your GP about your concerns?

One final point: you say that you have no faith in the "medical technicians" in your area. You are aware that biopsies are carried out by experienced surgeons, not medical technicians?

Best wishes,

Chris

 

Edited by member 30 Dec 2019 at 23:30  | Reason: Not specified

User
Posted 31 Dec 2019 at 00:39

Originally Posted by: Online Community Member

I’m not having the biopsy so no cost. 

My apologies; the way you worded your post makes it look like you are having the biopsy on the 9th? 

"Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards." Soren Kierkegaard

User
Posted 31 Dec 2019 at 05:36

Absolutely correct I’ve changed my predictive text to medical staff. Yeah it will be surgeons However the very same surgeons have taken no time to explain to me my options. My consultation lasted 3 mins to send me for an MRI. Slightly elevated PSA refereed by GP he said 4/6 week wait , goodbye he said. 

User
Posted 31 Dec 2019 at 09:13
There are no options during tests, Ian. It's a standard set of diagnostic procedures: an MRI scan, then a biopsy, then (if the biopsy finds cancer) a bone scan to check for spread outside the prostate. Only after all the tests are complete do the results go to MDT where experts in all the appropriate fields discuss your case and recommend one or more treatments. You are going through the absolutely standard test process, and there are no options to discuss until it's all complete.

Best wishes,

Chris

User
Posted 31 Dec 2019 at 10:44
I think Ian is probably right not to go ahead with further diagnostics at this point and we should cut him some slack. Seems to me that he is so distrustful of the medics that it could only end badly, anyway.
"Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards." Soren Kierkegaard

User
Posted 31 Dec 2019 at 11:28
I just hate to see someone throwing their life away, Lyn. No matter how badly a biopsy goes it’s nothing compared to dying from advanced prostate cancer 😢.

Best wishes,

Chris

User
Posted 31 Dec 2019 at 12:42
A thought here is if Ian is not prepared to even have a relatively simple and frequently performed procedure such as a biopsy, logically he would be far more opposed to having a Prostatectomy which carries a greater risk for severe side effects if cancer is found. That would probably leave RT and HT along with other systemic treatments for consideration which he might also find off-putting.

His choice!

Barry
User
Posted 31 Dec 2019 at 13:03

Hopefully one day men will be offered a choline PET/CT or PSMA scan before the old fashioned needle biopsy ( wishful thinking I know).

Roy

Edited by member 31 Dec 2019 at 13:08  | Reason: Not specified

User
Posted 31 Dec 2019 at 13:11

Originally Posted by: Online Community Member
Hopefully one day men will be offered a choline PET/CT scan instead of the old fashioned needle biopsy ( wishful thinking I know).

They don't fulfill the same diagnostic role.

User
Posted 31 Dec 2019 at 13:26

Originally Posted by: Online Community Member
A thought here is if Ian is not prepared to even have a relatively simple and frequently performed procedure such as a biopsy, logically he would be far more opposed to having a Prostatectomy which carries a greater risk for severe side effects if cancer is found.That would probably leave RT and HT along with other systemic treatments for consideration which he might also find off-putting.

A long shot, but if he gets a clear bone scan (which is pretty non-invasive except a single injection in the arm), I wonder if they might be prepared to just do HT+EBRT on him? The gleason score, and cancer mapping in the prostate don't matter for this treatment. They could treat it as high risk (his PSA isn't, but staging and gleason are unknown and therefore would probably have to be treated as high risk, and the PIRADs hints at it), which would mean treating seminal vesicles and pelvic lymph nodes too, which ups the risk of radiation side effects to the rectum a bit.

OTOH, I wouldn't be surprised if they refuse RT without a biopsy. RT is the expensive treatment option, and doing it without being 100% certain it's prostate cancer in the first place might not wash. (They wouldn't treat me when they were only 90% certain, which is why I had to have additional diagnostic tests, although that was because they regarded 90% certain as not high enough to justify the side effects, it wasn't due to the cost.)

User
Posted 31 Dec 2019 at 13:46

Hi Ian, I understand your concerns about stopping your medication for four days.  My brother has been taking blood thinning medication, following a stroke, for some years now and in February this year he was diagnosed with colon cancer and required an operation and there were concerns because of his blood thinning tablets having to be stopped. His Consultant changed his medication to injections and he had the operation and stays on the injections as he now requires a liver operation as the cancer has spread. Maybe a discussion with your GP could help with your concerns.  With regards to the biopsy, my husband was advised to have this following his MRI on his prostate, he had not had any symptoms and was very concerned about having the biopsy, lost a lot of sleep worrying about it, but decided to go ahead.  He said it was uncomfortable and yes he worried about having problems but took the prescribed antibiotics and no side effects at all.  We are all thankful that he did as he was diagnosed with cancer, Gleason score 3+4 and the bone scan revealed a lesion on his right hip which he is now having 6 sessions of chemotherapy (docetaxel).  Fingers crossed that this will give him many more years. Ange

User
Posted 31 Dec 2019 at 14:53

If they had the common decency to explain the result of my MRI either over the phone or by appointment then I’d have more trust in the next step. They didn’t they just sent a letter to forward me into the next stage of a biopsy. The appoint clerk advised I stop the blood thinning medication 48 hours before. 
I live on the west coast of Scotland and our health service is in crisis. 
Your  your replies are so helpful and I can’t thank you enough that you’ve taken time out to reply. So much construction valid information of which I agree with it all. 
But my issue is not what I’m hearing on here it’s what I’m not hearing from a prospective surgeon as to why they want to do this. Yes I know in medical terms the biopsy should be pain free that’s not my concern it’s the lack of information as to why I need it. 
I think I should stop posting on here because I’m just not making sense. I’m probably more fearful of what they find. Tbh one reply nailed it in that I wouldn’t want any further treatment if they do find cancer. Sorry for wasting your time folks but to be truthful the who idea has spooked me and I’m not good at dealing with this. If you knew me I’m one of life’s problem solvers  I give out constructive advice but I just don’t deal with my own issues. 
Thanks again and good luck with your journeys from here. 

User
Posted 31 Dec 2019 at 14:55

Such a brave man , Ange. 

User
Posted 31 Dec 2019 at 15:03
I hope you do go ahead with the biopsy next month. It should tell whether you have cancer or not, and if so, what grade.

Your surgeon and anaesthetist will be fully up to speed with your medical condition when you go for your pre-operative tests, and they won’t put you at risk if they feel you are not OK with the biopsy procedure.

Once you have the facts you can weigh up what treatment (if any) you want to undergo.

Best of luck for 2020!

Cheers, John.

User
Posted 31 Dec 2019 at 15:22
The reason the surgeon wants a biopsy is because the MRI scan cannot definitively say if you have or have not got cancer in the prostate. I’ve had 3 MRI scans over the past three years and the only thing it told the surgeon was that I had a lesion / abnormality. This lesion did not increase in size and at one point when my PSA started to decrease It looked like I was in the clear. It was only after a second biopsy that they found a single core with 4+4 cancer.
User
Posted 31 Dec 2019 at 15:22

Originally Posted by: Online Community Member

A long shot, but if he gets a clear bone scan (which is pretty non-invasive except a single injection in the arm), I wonder if they might be prepared to just do HT+EBRT on him? The gleason score, and cancer mapping in the prostate don't matter for this treatment. They could treat it as high risk (his PSA isn't, but staging and gleason are unknown and therefore would probably have to be treated as high risk, and the PIRADs hints at it), which would mean treating seminal vesicles and pelvic lymph nodes too, which ups the risk of radiation side effects to the rectum a bit.

OTOH, I wouldn't be surprised if they refuse RT without a biopsy. RT is the expensive treatment option, and doing it without being 100% certain it's prostate cancer in the first place might not wash. (They wouldn't treat me when they were only 90% certain, which is why I had to have additional diagnostic tests, although that was because they regarded 90% certain as not high enough to justify the side effects, it wasn't due to the cost.)

 

Honestly, would you be prepared to treat him on this basis? I wouldn't. If Ian is this angry about what seems to be a fairly normal diagnostic process, can you imagine what it would be like if treatment caused side effects? Claims, counter-claims, PALS, threats of being sued, 'no-one told me there might be side effects', 'no-one told me that not having a biopsy might mean the RT was targeted to the wrong area', etc, etc.  

 

Ian, I hope that with a little time, your urologist will either agree to see you and explain in more detailed or you will find another urologist that you can trust more. Or you could phone the number at the top of this website and order the toolkit which explains everything you need to know. 

"Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards." Soren Kierkegaard

User
Posted 31 Dec 2019 at 15:47

Originally Posted by: Online Community Member

If they had the common decency to explain the result of my MRI either over the phone or by appointment then I’d have more trust in the next step. They didn’t they just sent a letter to forward me into the next stage of a biopsy.



This is perfectly normal. You aren’t being singled out for special treatment. They do all the diagnostic tests and THEN you have an appointment to discuss the results.

Quote:

But my issue is not what I’m hearing on here it’s what I’m not hearing from a prospective surgeon as to why they want to do this. Yes I know in medical terms the biopsy should be pain free that’s not my concern it’s the lack of information as to why I need it. 

Why they want to do it is because looking at cells from your prostate under a microscope is the only way to know what type of cancer it is, and that determines what the optimal treatment is. A scan can see a tumour, but it can’t tell what type of cancer cells are in the tumour.

Quote:
I think I should stop posting on here because I’m just not making sense. I’m probably more fearful of what they find. Tbh one reply nailed it in that I wouldn’t want any further treatment if they do find cancer. Sorry for wasting your time folks but to be truthful the who idea has spooked me and I’m not good at dealing with this. If you knew me I’m one of life’s problem solvers  I give out constructive advice but I just don’t deal with my own issues. 
Thanks again and good luck with your journeys from here. 


Forgive me, but I find the idea that you’re willing to risk dying from cancer when you have what is in all likelihood a perfectly treatable condition to be truly bizarre, but it’s your life to throw away if you wish. I wish you all the best for the future.

 

Chris

 

User
Posted 31 Dec 2019 at 16:35

Hi Ian, I have been following this forum since my husbands diagnosis last September and today was the first time I have written anything but when I read your dilemma  I felt I had to.  I am sure anyone on this forum and who are on this journey all felt like you do, anger, frustration and total disbelief that this is happening. Tbh Keith was a real mess, together with myself although I did try to hide it, but as he has gone on this journey and eventually we met his Oncologist who had all the results and went through everything with us, Keith really felt he was in good hands and has put his faith in this Consultant and moves forward each day. I hope you have someone to talk to as you will need support.  From what I’ve read on this forum, the Specialist Nurses are brilliant.

Keith and I wish you all the best for your future.

Ange

User
Posted 31 Dec 2019 at 19:23

Originally Posted by: Online Community Member

Hi Ian, I have been following this forum since my husbands diagnosis last September and today was the first time I have written anything but when I read your dilemma  I felt I had to.  I am sure anyone on this forum and who are on this journey all felt like you do, anger, frustration and total disbelief that this is happening. Tbh Keith was a real mess, together with myself although I did try to hide it, but as he has gone on this journey and eventually we met his Oncologist who had all the results and went through everything with us, Keith really felt he was in good hands and has put his faith in this Consultant and moves forward each day. I hope you have someone to talk to as you will need support.  From what I’ve read on this forum, the Specialist Nurses are brilliant.

Keith and I wish you all the best for your future.

Ange

 

thank you Ange for such a lovely reply. 

 
Forum Jump  
©2025 Prostate Cancer UK