Originally Posted by: Online Community MemberA long shot, but if he gets a clear bone scan (which is pretty non-invasive except a single injection in the arm), I wonder if they might be prepared to just do HT+EBRT on him? The gleason score, and cancer mapping in the prostate don't matter for this treatment. They could treat it as high risk (his PSA isn't, but staging and gleason are unknown and therefore would probably have to be treated as high risk, and the PIRADs hints at it), which would mean treating seminal vesicles and pelvic lymph nodes too, which ups the risk of radiation side effects to the rectum a bit.
OTOH, I wouldn't be surprised if they refuse RT without a biopsy. RT is the expensive treatment option, and doing it without being 100% certain it's prostate cancer in the first place might not wash. (They wouldn't treat me when they were only 90% certain, which is why I had to have additional diagnostic tests, although that was because they regarded 90% certain as not high enough to justify the side effects, it wasn't due to the cost.)
Honestly, would you be prepared to treat him on this basis? I wouldn't. If Ian is this angry about what seems to be a fairly normal diagnostic process, can you imagine what it would be like if treatment caused side effects? Claims, counter-claims, PALS, threats of being sued, 'no-one told me there might be side effects', 'no-one told me that not having a biopsy might mean the RT was targeted to the wrong area', etc, etc.
Ian, I hope that with a little time, your urologist will either agree to see you and explain in more detailed or you will find another urologist that you can trust more. Or you could phone the number at the top of this website and order the toolkit which explains everything you need to know.