I'm interested in conversations about and I want to talk about
Know exactly what you want?
Show search

Notification

Error

123>

PSA 33 but no apparent urgency for diagnosis - PSA33,Scans (CT / MRI / Bone scan),Biopsy

User
Posted 28 Mar 2018 at 14:45

Hi Everyone,

I am in the early stages of diagnosis. 

I’m 68 years old and for some time have been experiencing problems with urination frequency which I had assumed was due to taking diuretics for high blood pressure.

On 7 February 2018 I experienced an episode of haematospermia. (blood in semen)

On 21 February 2018 I visited my GP and was given a digital examination which seemed normal. My PSA test result however was 33.

On 6 March 2018 I was seen by a Nurse Consultant at the urology clinic of NHS funded GP Care Ltd for a planned TRUS biopsy but this was not performed.

Having read in the press that an mpMRI scan was more likely to detect a cancerous tumour and was less invasive, I challenged the decision to perform a TRUS biopsy first.  A digital examination suggested an enlarged prostate with no obvious signs of cancer.  I was therefore sent for an MRI scan. Both my GP and the Nurse Consultant assured me that the haemtospermia was not an indicator for prostate cancer and indeed after just one more episode it now appears to have be resolved without any treatment. 

On 21 March 2018 an MRI scan was performed at North Bristol NHS Trust. While there I asked one of the radiology team if the scanner being used was an mpMRI scanner.  The reply was that it wasn’t but was very good and gave very good images! 

I now have to wait anxiously for up to 4 weeks for the MRI results. My understanding is that if my MRI scan indicates cancer, I will be offered a TRUS biopsy at the GP Care Ltd clinic. I am more than a little concerned that they may not have used an mpMRI scanner and the results may be unreliable.

According to the North Bristol Trust – NHS – Urology website there is a One Stop 2 Week Waiting Urology Service available at the same hospital I went for my MRI scan.

https://www.nbt.nhs.uk/bristol-urological-institute/urology-patient-services/urology-one-stop-clinic

I feel that I could have been diagnosed much sooner if my GP I had been referred me there? My GP says that the GP Care Ltd. service is the one used in my area.  

 

User
Posted 28 Mar 2018 at 16:26

The “Gold Standard” for PCa diagnosis is a multi-parametric MRI at high resolution (at least 2 Tesla but 3T is best) FIRST, followed by a template biopsy if necessary under general anaesthetic if you are well enough for it.

Two friends who have been down this road before, separately told me: “Don’t let them palm you off with a TRUS”, they both had had a TRUS but were then called back for a more accurate template or target guided biopsy, as did another man on my recovery ward who had a TRUS last August, and then had to wait until this year for another one.

There are others here who have had to have two biopsies instead of one, because the TRUS is random. During my template they sampled 42 cores, whereas a TRUS might take only 9. It’s cheaper for the cash-strapped NHS, which is why they try to railroad you into having one.

Some may disagree with me, but I am glad I stuck out for a template, although it still confirmed I have cancer😟

Edited by member 28 Mar 2018 at 16:57  | Reason: Not specified

User
Posted 29 Mar 2018 at 08:20

Thanks again for the thoughtful and informed comments LynEyre and all. We are going away for Easter and I haven't yet worked out if it's practical to access these forums from a phone so I hope you won't think I'm being rude if I don't manage to post over the weekend.

User
Posted 08 Apr 2018 at 08:39

Originally Posted by: Online Community Member
How awful Lynn. These systems would have me feeling like hitting my head against a brick wall. 😣I think Rob is quite right to insist on seeing a urologist though.

 

.... and that's exactly how I do feel at times Peggles. https://community.prostatecanceruk.org/editors/tiny_mce/plugins/emoticons/img/smiley-smile.gif

User
Posted 08 Apr 2018 at 14:17

Just for the record, I did not misunderstand the situation. It is just as I suspected and a daft way to try to save money at the expense of care quality. I can't see how hillsrob has benefitted at all. Get on to your local MP, mate, this is NOT the way to go!

AC

User
Posted 13 Apr 2018 at 08:46

Thanks again everyone for your concern and valuable inputs. I'm feeling a little more relaxed now waiting for an appointment. The calm before the storm no doubt. I did a little research to see what a kidney cyst might mean. If it's benign it could be partially the cause of my high blood pressure for the last 20 years. https://community.prostatecanceruk.org/editors/tiny_mce/plugins/emoticons/img/smiley-smile.gif

User
Posted 24 May 2018 at 12:26

Thanks for your good wishes lisabun. I hope things go well for your Dad too. 

I now have an appointment on the 31st May 2018 for a NM (Nuclear Medicine) full body Bone scan and then a consultation on 5th June 2018 with a urologist. 

I'll watch out for your posts and try to contribute where I can. 

 

User
Posted 02 Jun 2018 at 21:01

My Bone scan was in two stages too and I got tge all clear..

User
Posted 03 Jun 2018 at 08:17
Can’t remember how many stages there were in my scan, but as I said, much quicker, less claustrophobic and less annoying than my MRI.

Plus Her Loveliness was in the room with me so I could prattle away to her during it. The difference is that you are radioactive after the dye injection, and the scan just picks up on radioactive spots if any.

I had to laugh, on telly the other day at Kennedy Airport an Arab lady set off a hand-held Geiger counter at customs. The customs guys went mad, scanning her baggage repeatedly, thinking she was Al Qaeda with a dirty bomb about to attack New York. After about half an hour of panic, she told them she had had a bone scan a day or so before!

Surprising, as the isotopes they inject you with have a very short half-life, and just shows how sensitive those radioactivity scanners are.

Hope you get a good result.

User
Posted 03 Jun 2018 at 11:23

Originally Posted by: Online Community Member

Thanks Jonathan and John. (I've now learned how to thank with the thumbs up button https://community.prostatecanceruk.org/Scripts/tinymce/plugins/emoticons/img/smiley-embarassed.gif )

I wondered if I should have asked if there was anything to be concerned about. Some radiologists volunteer good news but instead I felt the body language was telling me something on this occasion. 

Just 2 days to wait till I find out. 

 

I have never known a radiographer to say anything about what they observed, and all my X-rays, scans have been clear, except for one mpMRI scan, obviously!

Her Loveliness says she does remember the guy coming in half-way through and moving something - maybe that was a second scan.

I hope you are worrying needlessly, but it’s only to be understood.

User
Posted 05 Jun 2018 at 21:47

Hi Rob, I had my bone scan at Southmead, great hospital. My PSA was 38 on diagnosis after template biopsy, Gleason 4:5 T2c at WSM General, an all round good experience. I’m now awaiting RT at Bristol Haemotology and Oncology centre in mid July.

 

User
Posted 06 Jun 2018 at 11:42

Rob

i was cycling an average 170 miles a week before diagnosis. I have noticed a loss of, shall I say, impetus? 

I have cut down from 7 rides a week to 4 since starting hormone treatment and feel better for it 

I hope to carry on at least some cycling during my 6 weeks Monday to Friday RT. I have been told by my nurse that some of the tiredness felt during RT is not purely physical, so not collapsing on the couch and pushing myself to go for a therapeutic bike ride should be done where possible and safely.

Both my Oncologist and primary care nurse agree my fitness level for a 66 year old is helping me through the mid phase of my PCa journey.

Weight gain around the waist is what I’m fighting at the moment!

Alan

 

 

Show Most Thanked Posts
User
Posted 28 Mar 2018 at 16:26

The “Gold Standard” for PCa diagnosis is a multi-parametric MRI at high resolution (at least 2 Tesla but 3T is best) FIRST, followed by a template biopsy if necessary under general anaesthetic if you are well enough for it.

Two friends who have been down this road before, separately told me: “Don’t let them palm you off with a TRUS”, they both had had a TRUS but were then called back for a more accurate template or target guided biopsy, as did another man on my recovery ward who had a TRUS last August, and then had to wait until this year for another one.

There are others here who have had to have two biopsies instead of one, because the TRUS is random. During my template they sampled 42 cores, whereas a TRUS might take only 9. It’s cheaper for the cash-strapped NHS, which is why they try to railroad you into having one.

Some may disagree with me, but I am glad I stuck out for a template, although it still confirmed I have cancer😟

Edited by member 28 Mar 2018 at 16:57  | Reason: Not specified

User
Posted 28 Mar 2018 at 17:26

Thanks Bollinge for your detailed and helpful reply. I wish you the very best of treatment and outcome following you own diagnosis.

I will try to hold out for a template biopsy but that will mean getting referred on to North Bristol Trust - One Stop Clinic.

While trawling the internet I stumbled upon this Freedom of Information Request from PCUK to North Bristol Trust for information about available scanners and their use in prostate cancer diagnosis.

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/multiparametric_mri_usage_data_f_139

It seems that they do have both 1.5T and 3T multi-parametric MRI scanners available but I don't know which if either they used for my scan. I'll try to update you when I get my results. The following is an extract from the response to the Freedom of Information Request:

2. How many scanners do you have available to use for mpMRI scans before prostate biopsy?
2 out of 4 scanners at Southmead hospital can be used for mpMRI prostate. Although the majority of prostate scans are carried out on the GE MR450
3. For each individual scanner used for mpMRI scans before prostate biopsy, please provide the following:
Scanner 1
• Make GE
• Model MR450
• Magnetic field strength 1.5T
• Age 6 YEARS
• When the scanner is due to be replaced APPROX AFTER 10 YEARS
Scanner 2
• Make PHILIPS
• Model INGENIA dSTREAM 3T
• Magnetic field strength 3T
• Age 2 YEARS
• When the scanner is due to be replaced APPROX AFTER 10YEARS

User
Posted 28 Mar 2018 at 18:56

Many hospitals do not yet have a 3 Tesla scanner but even those that do sometimes use the 1.5 model. My scans at UCLH were generally done using the higher resolution scanner but the last one at check up (which I queried but told it was adequate), was done on a 1.5 scanner.

Barry
User
Posted 28 Mar 2018 at 19:07

Even with a mpMRI there is no guarantee that the results are 100% reliable - just as with biopsies, you can get false negatives and false positives. The important thing is to make sure you get a scan and a biopsy, and that the scan is not done too soon after a biopsy (where bleeding / bruising can affect the scan result). If the guy told you that you didn't have an mpMRI then you probably didn't. You could ask for a second referral to the other Trust but it seems to me that the quickest way to get answers is to wait for the result of your MRI and then insist on a biopsy regardless of the scan result.

At this point, do you know that your trust will refuse to give you a template biopsy? The fact that they cancelled your TRUS and gave you a scan instead suggests that they may be catching up with the 21st century?

You say at the end of your post "I feel I could have been diagnosed much sooner" - with an enlarged prostate it is entirely possible that you have a benign condition and that there is indeed no cancer - we have had members with PSA 2 or 3 times higher than yours who do not have any apparent prostate cancer despite numerous and frequent tests.

"Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards." Soren Kierkegaard

User
Posted 28 Mar 2018 at 23:00

Thanks Old Barry and LynEyre for your support, inputs and encouragement. I don't know how I will take it when I get my diagnosis but I'm trying to be prepared.

LyneEyre: The guy that told me it wasn't an mpMRI qualified his remark by saying it didn't have ultrasound which I thought was a bit odd? He was the guy that prepared me for the contrast injection so it's possible that he didn't really know. Today I found a study report (admittedly dated 2007) which concluded: Serum PSA >30 ng/ml is an almost certain predictor of the presence of prostate cancer.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2574301/

I'm pretty certain that GP Care Ltd won't have the equipment to do a template biopsy without further referral to North Bristol Trust – NHS – Urology and of course further waiting for an appointment. They were using a mobile set up for a TRUS biopsy in a small health centre. I'm learning all the time and, thanks to all of you, will have more questions to ask when I go back for the MRI results.


User
Posted 28 Mar 2018 at 23:33

It is a good predictor but we have men on here with much higher PSA and only a very large prostate! So yes, prepare yourself but don't assume it is nailed on. It goes the other way as well of course - we have men whose PSA was in normal range but still had extensive spread and my father-in-law had a PSA of 1.2 so no-one noticed the mets in his soft organs until the day before he died.

A mobile unit in a health centre sounds hellish :-( As you say, very unlikely to have the facilities for general anaesthetic. As for the mention of ultrasound, they may be one of the centres trialling mpMRI combined with ultrasound guided biopsy - everything is done at once. Nationally, there are very few mpMRI facilities and an awful lot of research going on to work out how best to use it.

"Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards." Soren Kierkegaard

User
Posted 29 Mar 2018 at 08:20

Thanks again for the thoughtful and informed comments LynEyre and all. We are going away for Easter and I haven't yet worked out if it's practical to access these forums from a phone so I hope you won't think I'm being rude if I don't manage to post over the weekend.

User
Posted 04 Apr 2018 at 13:52

Just a brief update. I called GP Care (NHS) Ltd today as it's two weeks since my MRI scan. They told me the report was not yet back from radiology. I called the North Bristol Trust radiology department and they advised that there is a backlog getting reports out but noted that my scan was marked urgent and they would chase it further to hopefully get a report out by Friday.

Edited by member 04 Apr 2018 at 20:11  | Reason: Not specified

User
Posted 04 Apr 2018 at 15:29
Originally Posted by: Online Community Member

Just a brief update. I called GP Care (NHS) Ltd today as it's two weeks since my MRI scan. They told me the report were not yet back from radiology. I called the North Bristol Trust radiology department and they advised that there is a backlog getting reports out but noted that my scan was marked urgent and they would chase it further to hopefully get a report out by Friday.

Good job you are proactive, otherwise your radiology report might be at the back of the queue! And you’ve possibly got a biopsy to look forward to. 😟

There is so much right with our NHS, and so much wrong!

Edited by member 04 Apr 2018 at 17:27  | Reason: Not specified

User
Posted 07 Apr 2018 at 17:23

Yesterday (Friday 6th April) I called North Bristol Trust radiology. It seems putting a chase on the report worked as they told me it had been sent to GP Care (NHS) Ltd on Thursday 5th April. I called GP Care (NHS) Ltd and they confirmed that they had received it. It would now go to a Urologist for 'triaging' and then on to my own GP who will give me the results of the MRI some time next week.

User
Posted 07 Apr 2018 at 19:29

Hillsrob, I find the runaround you are being given distinctly odd. You should be seen by a urologist and/or an oncologist, not a GP. I wouldn't trust my GP with anything to do with cancer, way over his head, not primary care!!!

AC

User
Posted 07 Apr 2018 at 20:05
For what it's worth I wholeheartedly agree with AC.I don't understand why you are being passed from pillar to post for your results etc. You need continuity of care for something like this.

With the best will in the world I don't see how a GP can answer your questions or explain your results to you fully. Can you not insist you are seen by a Urologist/ Oncologist instead? They certainly deal with prostate cancer patients differently in your neck of the woods. I hope they don't roll out this system to the rest of the country.

Regards

Ann

Edited by member 07 Apr 2018 at 20:11  | Reason: Not specified

User
Posted 07 Apr 2018 at 22:35

Hi AC and Peggles. Many thanks for your concern.

From day one I have felt like I am outside the main loop of treatment. I have expressed my concerns to my GP to the point where he got quite cross with me. I have called and emailed GP Care (NHS) Ltd but they promised to call me back, even suggest that I go private and haven't replied to my emails in which I asked for answers to 3 questions:

Q1. Do I have a Consultant Urologist overseeing my case? If so who is he/she? Which organisation does he/she report to for my case?

On my MRI scan reference information it stated GP Care - Dr <nnnn>. I have contacted his secretary at North Bristol Trust but was advised that his name would just have been used as a doctors name is required in order to access the radiology facilities at North Bristol Trust.

Q2. I would like to know if my scan was carried out using a multi-parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI) scanner or a different type of MRI scanner?

The notes on my appointment say: MRI Pelvis Prostate , MRI Pelvis Prostate with Gadolinium.

Q3. According to the North Bristol Trust – NHS – Urology website there is a One Stop 2 Week Waiting Urology Service available at Southmead. Could I have been diagnosis sooner if I had been referred there?

https://www.nbt.nhs.uk/bristol-urological-institute/urology-patient-services/urology-one-stop-clinic

When I see my GP next week regardless of the results I will insist on being referred urgently to a urologist at North Bristol Trust NHS.

User
Posted 07 Apr 2018 at 22:59

I think AC and Peggles have misunderstood the situation. GP care is a private company set up in that area by GPs to reduce the number of hospital referrals. GP Care Ltd won the contract for NHS urology services some years ago - the GP refers you, the private company does the scans and, if thought necessary, a biopsy and then sends the results back to the GP who is paying for those tests. If the results are concerning, the GP will refer you to the hospital. GP Care Ltd does not employ any specialists so you won’t be under a urologist at the moment.

Yes, it seems like a s*** system to me too but like all the paediatric services that have been privatised in the Swindon area (resulting in very disabled children not being seen by a paediatrician for 18 months or more) this is how our NHS is being broken bit by bit.

"Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards." Soren Kierkegaard

User
Posted 07 Apr 2018 at 23:32
How awful Lynn. These systems would have me feeling like hitting my head against a brick wall. 😣I think Rob is quite right to insist on seeing a urologist though.

User
Posted 08 Apr 2018 at 08:38

Originally Posted by: Online Community Member

I think AC and Peggles have misunderstood the situation. GP care is a private company set up in that area by GPs to reduce the number of hospital referrals. GP Care Ltd won the contract for NHS urology services some years ago - the GP refers you, the private company does the scans and, if thought necessary, a biopsy and then sends the results back to the GP who is paying for those tests. If the results are concerning, the GP will refer you to the hospital. GP Care Ltd does not employ any specialists so you won’t be under a urologist at the moment.

Yes, it seems like a s*** system to me too but like all the paediatric services that have been privatised in the Swindon area (resulting in very disabled children not being seen by a paediatrician for 18 months or more) this is how our NHS is being broken bit by bit.

That's a useful bit of information LynEyre. GP Care (NHS) Ltd have told me over the phone that the results will go back to my GP. My GP insists that now that I have been referred to GP Care (NHS) Ltd, it is up to them to refer me on if I need further treatment. This is when he got quite cross with me for questioning the process. Let's see who turns out to be right. 

   

 

User
Posted 08 Apr 2018 at 08:39

Originally Posted by: Online Community Member
How awful Lynn. These systems would have me feeling like hitting my head against a brick wall. 😣I think Rob is quite right to insist on seeing a urologist though.

 

.... and that's exactly how I do feel at times Peggles. https://community.prostatecanceruk.org/editors/tiny_mce/plugins/emoticons/img/smiley-smile.gif

User
Posted 08 Apr 2018 at 14:17

Just for the record, I did not misunderstand the situation. It is just as I suspected and a daft way to try to save money at the expense of care quality. I can't see how hillsrob has benefitted at all. Get on to your local MP, mate, this is NOT the way to go!

AC

User
Posted 08 Apr 2018 at 14:38

I would like to think his results were so unremarkable and that is why he is being referred back to his GP for follow-up, rather than a specialist.

Fingers crossed Rob!

 
Forum Jump  
123>
©2025 Prostate Cancer UK