Originally Posted by: Online Community MemberI am not sure how helpful that is, to be honest. It doesn't seem very kind to warn someone away from what is normal practice in the UK simply because it is a bit different in your specific case. HT does far more than just alter a lab result - in most cases, it starves the cancer so that the radiotherapy has a bigger impact; to suggest it has no clinical benefit is bizarre. The paper you have linked is a literature review, based on other people's previous work including trials that closed in 2006 and 2010 - it is also hard to know what bias may have influenced the choice of data to use in the literature review ... generally speaking, you can find statistics to support whatever conclusion you hope to find.
Sorry if it was taken the wrong way, but I shared it to share information. I learn a lot from others posts and as a result I knew to ask specifically about HT with SRT. And my oncologist said for my situation, he would not recommend it. (whereas I know from posts here that most on this forum get HT). So being curious, I looked for more information on this.
More information on different practices can't be a bad thing. My center prides itself on being one of top cancer centers in the world. Doesn't mean everything they do is right, but wanted to just share my experience.
Edited by member 10 Sep 2020 at 14:00
| Reason: Not specified