I'm interested in conversations about and I want to talk about
Know exactly what you want?
Show search

Notification

Error

<12

Different opinions from 2 Hospitals=Dilemma

User
Posted 24 Feb 2017 at 06:25

Hi all.

I'm glad to hear there are many different "weapons" to fight this cancer. In fact, the uro said so when we last saw him last wensday. The point is to choose the right one. I hope you will have as much as possible done. It's is frustrating when at the time you fight some illness you have to fight red tape too.

Carry on. I'm sure tou will win. You are winning.

The best for you,

Lola.

User
Posted 24 Feb 2017 at 08:27

Barry

As always a very interesting and informative post. I wonder if the tone from Prof E of convential treatment (HT - chemo) is all that will be on offer going forward is due to your own circumstances or a NHS cut back on more groundbreaking treatment for PCa guys in general? If the latter thats a pity as its guys like you who moved treatment bounderies forward. It will be interesting to see if you take the view I gave it my very best shot but now it's time to settle for a more relaxed path. I hope you do but Barry is Barry :-)

Ray

User
Posted 24 Feb 2017 at 09:04

Interesting. I would expect the top focal guy to take all cases that will give his specialism an opportunity to shine so my take on this is that having already failed at RT and HIFU he does not believe that he can get you a cure either. And that is a significant thing isn't it Manwith .... you travelled far to get what you thought was the optimum RT provision but the outcome was not as you would have hoped, you are a great proponent of HIFU although it has possibly (you don't know for sure, fortunately) also failed. It seems the Prof does not believe that FLT would be any better.

Ray said what I was thinking; "I wonder at what point you might give in gracefully?" but that is not your style.

My dad's PSA is climbing slowly and last time we saw Mr P he put all the stats into his whizzy nomogram and predicted it will take 20 years to kill dad which would make him 99. Dad feels that is a reasonable target to aim for :-)

You may recall that Stan persuaded Mr P to remove the lymph nodes even though he was absolutely refusing point blank to have RP. It may have bought him a little time, who knows? Is there no surgeon that will take it out for you?

"Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards." Soren Kierkegaard
User
Posted 25 Feb 2017 at 00:18

Hi Barry,


I know you have gone into all of this to a much greater level than me, and all of my node business (detailed in profile) was ten years ago and is now superseded by newer treatments.  However, when I was diagnosed, so far as I understood it, their concerns about my node/s was due to the size of them.  They suspected PCa had spread to the nodes that were enlarged.


They had put me on HT from the outset, it turned out to be neoadjuvant HT, but initially it was merely HT to be going on with while they decided whether I merited RT.  At that time, their theory was that if the enlarged nodes shrank after 6 months on HT, then they were infected with PCa.  As it happened my nodes didn't shrink, but they still biopsied them to make sure, and it was only after they had confirmed that the enlarged nodes were benign that they went ahead with the RT.


So in your case, perhaps if at some stage in the future you go on HT, then it might be worth trying to get a scan after six months to see if there has been any change in the size of the nodes?


I don't know whether that might lead to a curative treatment option, but it might give you a clue, have they mentioned anything about the size of the nodes?


:)


Dave     

User
Posted 26 Feb 2017 at 02:42

Hi Dave,


Thank you for your thoughts. As regards the suspect node, Heidelberg to whom I sent a copy of my scans done by UCLH, in 2015 compared these with the scans they did covering the period 2008-11. They reported that the size and shape had not changed over this period and they felt the uptake of Choline was not sufficient for them to be convinced that this node was cancerous. This view was shared by the Marsden and QE Birmingham who also viewed the scans. However, UCLH believed the node was cancerous based on the uptake of Chlorine which they considered substantial. So a difference of interpretation.


The cores from 50 needles of my Prostate template biopsy in 2015 only showed 1 core with PCa and this was treated with HIFU. Yet from a post HIFU scan the UCLH report says the opinion is equivocal on whether there is some PCa within the Prostate.


Of course, I don't want to have further treatment if this is likely to be highly risky in introducing severe side effects but on the other hand I do want to consider what options other than just HT I have if PSA continues the upward trend. (It is clear that some consultants treat more aggressively than others). So if my PSA rises to 1.2, the point at which UCLH would start me on HT, I will consider more aggressive treatment elsewhere. My decision would also depend on what was on offer, how old and fit I was and what were the pros and cons.


Ray,


Professor E assured me that the decision for UCLH not to do anything other than initiate HT should PSA reach 1.2 was based solely on the battering my Prostate had already been subjected to and I believe this was his genuine opinion and not due to cost constraints.


Lyn,


As far as I am concerned it's not just a matter of longevity, it's the quality of life which would be impacted by long term HT that I would hope to avoid.


My mother used to say, "You never know when you're beaten". Sometimes this attitude has worked well but occasionally got me into trouble!!

Edited by member 26 Feb 2017 at 22:05  | Reason: Not specified

Barry
User
Posted 26 Feb 2017 at 10:23

Hi Barry,


I suppose I have the advantage in that having had HT twice, it holds no fear for me, I would cherish every extra year of life HT gave me.


However by the same token I don't want to be on HT if I don't need to be, so I need my doctors to convince me that I really need it, I think there is a tendency to put us on HT just to be on the safe side.  You know if I was an oncologist with a heavy case load and was presented with a shall we shan't we case, the easy option is to put the guy on HT.


In my case everything depends on the next PSA test, and I am anticipating the worse as I have 'doubled' twice in last three tests, 0.1, 0.2 and 0.4, so if the next one is 0.8 he will want me back on HT although I am tempted to hold out until it goes 1.6 or even 3.2.


He did say he was quite happy with intermittent HT, George H has lasted well on intermittent, and I think that is what I would prefer, but we haven't talked parameters yet.


Best of luck.


:)


Dave 

User
Posted 26 Feb 2017 at 18:26

Choline, not chlorine! The choline PET scans don't show cancer, just heightened activity levels, in terms of cell multiplication and division. They suggest areas for further attention and are no substitute for a clinician's experience and best judgement. UCLH were being cautious and may be right but the weight of opinion is with the others. Give it time, which you clearly have and the right course of action will become obvious. Per Dad's Army "don't panic!"

Good Luck

AC

User
Posted 26 Feb 2017 at 22:00

Yes Choline, a senior moment AC, thanks for pointing out! Another explanation of a Choline PET scan indicating cancer locations by the uptake of Choline in the PET scan is 'Because prostate cancer cells are hungry for anything that will fuel their rapid growth, it is this feature that allows the tumor (US spelling), to be imaged. Prostate cancer eagerly takes up choline, which is a naturally occurring part of the B-vitamin complex. The tumor cells need nutrients to multiply quickly, and they use choline as a kind of building block. It collects in any prostate cancer tumors, whether located in the prostate, lymph nodes, or more remote locations. When choline is labeled (US script) with a type of radioactivity called C-11, the PET scanner picks up the exact location of the tracer concentrations. As 3-dimensional images of the target regions are processed, the tumors are shown as brightly lit spots or areas.' The link is here http://sperlingprostatecenter.com/choline-c-11-pet-scans-prostate-cancer/ There are variations on Choline but the result is similar.
Had I taken the advice of UCLH I would have been on HT for about seventeen months by now and even my usual consultant there said I did well to take the advice of others rather than his and defer it's use for the time being.


No sense of panic on my part but as when I was a scout, the motto 'Be Prepared' is applicable.


Dave,


I do wish you well and hope that IHT works for you as it seems to do for some, if it comes to that.


 

Edited by member 26 Feb 2017 at 22:08  | Reason: Not specified

Barry
 
Forum Jump  
<12
©2025 Prostate Cancer UK